Research

Risevest · Send-time study

Two thirds arrived after 11pm.

We stayed subscribed to Risevest for eight months and logged when all thirty emails arrived.

  • 30emails logged over eight months
  • 20arrived after 11pm, some at 1am and 2am

Why a long capture

Snapshots only catch the welcome sequence.

Most lifecycle teardowns are a snapshot: sign up, screenshot the first few emails, draw conclusions. That catches the welcome sequence and nothing else, and the welcome sequence is the part every company has already polished.

So we stayed subscribed for eight months and logged when each of thirty emails arrived.

Four of them, exactly as logged

The timestamps.

  • Thursday 9:12pm
  • Tuesday 4:11pm
  • Thursday 1:09am
  • Saturday 11:06am

Against the benchmark

Most of it landed in the quietest band.

According to MailerLite’s own reported analysis of 3.6 million campaigns (2025), peak engagement falls at 6–8am, second at 12–2pm, and lowest at 10pm–6am. That benchmark is MailerLite’s, not Perennus data. Two thirds of what we received landed in its lowest band.

Inconsistent timing makes it harder to establish a predictable communication rhythm. That’s a lifecycle principle, not a measured outcome of this study.

What we would check first

Three explanations, none established.

  1. 1

    UTC default

    Many tools send in UTC unless the timezone is set.

  2. 2

    No ownership

    Someone queues it when it’s ready; nobody checks when it lands.

  3. 3

    No measurement

    If open rate isn’t cut by send time, nobody finds out.

None of these is established for Risevest. They’re where we would start.

What that costs in attention is a question for the data. We only have the timestamps.

Find the revenue you’re losing.

Tell us where you think it breaks. We’ll show you what the evidence says.